Visit Ahmar Mustikhan's column >>

AHMAR MUSTIKHAN

I am a journalist of longstanding and have worked in the U.S., U.A.E. and Pakistan.
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 123; Links Seeded: 474
Member Since: 12/2008Last Seen: 2/09/2010

Bugti anniversary: 'Down with Pakistan' day marked in Washington D.C.

Live Poll

Can Baluchistan win freedom?

Yes
No
Unsure
View Results

Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti, 79, who was lovingly called Tiger of Baluchistan for his bravery and courage.

Supporters of fiery national liberation leader Sardar Brahamdagh Bugti in his native Sui on Baluchistan's independence day August 11. -- Picture Hashoor Khan

advertisement

WASHINGTON DC -- The third death anniversary of a Baluch statesman who was killed on the orders of a Pakistani dictator and coup plotter was observed as "Down with Pakistan" day in the U.S. capital Wednesday.

Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti, 79, former governor and chief minister of Baluchistan, who was lovingly called the Tiger of Baluchistan, was killed on August 26, 2006, on the orders of Pakistan's last military ruler General Pervez Musharraf.

The protest in Washington D.C. was organized by the pro-liberation American Friends of Baluchistan.

A.F.B. activists began their protest early Wednesday in front of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, where Muslim Lakhani, who had heaped praise on the military regime of Musharraf is a council member.

The A.F.B. shamed Lakhani in a handbill that read "Looters can't be philanthropists."

Under the tutelage of Musharraf regime, while the Pakistani soldiers were busy in the army operation that saw Bugti annihilated, Lakhani had transferred one of the largest copper and gold deposits in the world at Reko Diq in his company's name – though he had no prior experience in gold and copper mining -- and later sold it to Barrick Gold Corporation of Canada and Antofagasta of Chile.

"This innovative project shared its profits with the Balochi people in a manner that made its presence welcome in the region," Lakhani's profile on the Woodrow Wilson site says, but a case is pending against him in Pakistan's Supreme Court over the controversial sale of the gold and copper mines as it was widely deemed as detrimental to Baluchistan interests.

"There is no such thing as Balochi people. Balochi is the language of the Baloch [also spelled Baluch] people," an A.F.B. worker told a local radi channel in Washington DC. "It's a shame someone who does not know the proper name of the Baluch, ganged up with the Pakistani occupation forces to make a windfall at Reko Diq."

Lakhani, who came to the US in 2006, donated more than $82,000 to the ruling Democratic Party in the U.S. and last year sponsored the Washington D.C. visit of five Pakistani journalists – two of them brothers of military spokesman Major General Athar Abbas. The Karachi-based journalists, among other things, discussed the challenges in reporting from tribal areas.

The A.F.B. handbill was based on a report by Basque journalist, Karlos Zurutuza, and elaborated the abject poverty of the Baluch and violation of their basic human rights under Pakistani military thumb.

Though Lakhani boasts his controversial sale of the gold and copper mines as a development, locals from Reko Diq provided the A.F.B. with a list of 42 persons in the administration of the mining company none of whom is a Baluch.

Later an A.F.B. activist toured downtown DC with a banner "DOWN WITH PAKISTAN" and was cheered by motorists in the American capital. Many U.S. citizens feel their government is not doing enough to check Pakistan over its army's role in the spread of global Islamic terrorism.

Some D.C. residents took pictures of the protest with their cell phones.

In an interview with a local radio network reporter Pete Tucker, an A.F.B. worker narrated the story of blood and tears of Baluchistan since its forced annexation by Pakistan on March 27, 1948 – more than seven months after the British left India divided in August 1947.

Musharraf had called the Baluch leaders pygmies and said they would be hit in a manner they won't even know. After the killing of Bugti, the army killed another major leader Bala'ach Marri on November 20, 2007, among more than 3,000 victims of war.

In April this year, the army killed three other nationalist leaders Ghulam Mohammed Baluch, Lala Munir Baluch and Sher Mohammed Baluch.

More than 2,000 are still missing in Baluchistan and tens of thousands are internally displaced persons in Baluchistan, having the sky as their roof.

After Bugti's extra judicial killing, Pakistan army did not allow a proper burial for one of the most loved Baluch leader and for two years all members of the late leader's family were barred from visiting his grave.

Pakistan's interior minister Rahman Malik described Nawab Bugti as a martyr, but his killer Musharraf has not been booked in spite of appeals of the late leader's family members and other Baluch political and human rights activists.

Since the killing of Nawab Bugti three years ago, the situation in Baluchistan plummeted from bad to worse. Reports from Baluchistan said a complete strike was observed in the length and breadth of Baluchistan on the call of nationalist parties and at least 10 people were killed in violence.

Bugti's mantle has now been taken over by is political heir and grandson Sardar Brahamdagh Bugti, 30. Pakistani intelligence agencies are busy in trying to pit members of the Bugti family one against the other.

Nawab Bugti epitomized the 15th century Baluch warrior Chakar Khan Rind. Like Rind who fought for the honor of a wronged woman named Gohar, the Baluch leader threw the gauntlet at the fourth largest army in the world after an army Captain Hammad raped a women medic Dr. Shazia Khalid on the wintry night of January 2, 2005 in Bugti's hometown of Sui.

Women or other weaker sections of society in a chieftain's territory is called their bahut, or ward, and in Baluchi culture and tradition, the chieftain is duty bound to protect them even at the risk of his own life. Bugti sacrificed his life but upheld the time-honored tradition.

Other than killing, abduction and torture of tens of thousands of Baluch, one of the worst crimes of the Pakistani occupation was the testing of nuclear weapons in Baluchistan in May 1998.

"Pakistan has no business to keep nuclear weapons. If nothing is done about it each and every Westerner from London to New York will be endangered," the A.F.B. worker who chose anonymity warned, while advocating freedom for Baluchistan.

  • 3 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
2.7
{"commentId":9088596,"authorDomain":"mustikhan"}

Former U.S. ambassador to Pakistan, Robert Oakley, described Bugti as a martyr for a just cause.

{"commentId":9088596,"threadId":"661241","contentId":"3196286","authorDomain":"mustikhan"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:49 AM EDT
{"commentId":9088781,"authorDomain":"aslamk"}

Hello,

did you have any empirical evidences against Musharaff? or you are making an allegation for the sake of an argument.

Any way, this is good article which highlighting an issues of Baluchistan problem to the world stage.

what your opinion?

Thanks.

{"commentId":9088781,"threadId":"661241","contentId":"3196286","authorDomain":"aslamk"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:10 AM EDT
{"commentId":9089192,"authorDomain":"mustikhan"}

What kind of empirical evidence? Whether he was a military despot? Or coup leader? Or what he in fact said and did to Baluchistan?

{"commentId":9089192,"threadId":"661241","contentId":"3196286","authorDomain":"mustikhan"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#3 - Thu Aug 27, 2009 2:03 AM EDT
{"commentId":9090751,"authorDomain":"aslamk"}

hi

i am not aware about Mushruff's policy towards Baluchistan. kindly provide some information and historical background of it.

any way, as far as historical evidences are concerned it is scientific truth, so any rational can not deny the fact and its importance to analysis the present crises and situation. Throughout human civilization, human nature remains the same all over the world despite the fact that cultural differences plays the critical role to shape the value and opinion.

The only fact in the study of history is that it is usually contested by multiple interpretations. Of course, multiple interpretations are not the same as inaccurate and false interpretations. any acceptable interpretation must have analytical rigour and be backed by credible evidence.

This is way to do the research to find the truth..

it is always good to write an article without becoming a slave of any ideology..

Thanks...

{"commentId":9090751,"threadId":"661241","contentId":"3196286","authorDomain":"aslamk"}
  • 1 vote
#3.1 - Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:02 AM EDT
{"commentId":9109919,"authorDomain":"bigsaf"}

Aslam, Musharraf still continued a very hardline against Baluchistan, once threatening opposition in Balochistan with words like (I'm paraphrasing) 'Don't push us, otherwise you won't know what hit you' or something of the sort. This is on record. Despite Gwadar there really weren't many concrete reforms in Baluchistan, except for the Nazim system which was implemented around the country.

Ahmer, for me its not black and white. I understand for your tribe and people he was a freedom fighter and a symbol of resistance. But Bugti was no saint (of course, neither the Pak government and army). Whatever the cause, he was still a feudal and still went around as a warlord. Don't have anything against the cause...but I do question the deeds of Akbar Bugti...

{"commentId":9109919,"threadId":"661241","contentId":"3196286","authorDomain":"bigsaf"}
  • 2 votes
#3.2 - Fri Aug 28, 2009 2:35 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":9123404,"authorDomain":"moshawn"}

i know Mr. Bugti and many of similar leaders in Pakistan, including old time leader in Bangla Desh (when it was Pakistan) were very much Pakistani minded and enjoyed and lived in their youth in the freedoms. Mr. Bugti studied in Lahore and spent greater part of his life overseas and in Pakistani capitol and native baluchistan where he had a fuedal power base. Apprently there seems to be some serious differences with the Pakistani administration that led to his rebellious stance just as it happened to leaders in Bangla Desh. Clearly nobody seems to go into and read the history why this happens and try to find a solution to the problems. Rather the history repeats itself on just another day.

I would personally like to see a peaceful reolution to issues even if there are sacrifices to be made now for better a future. One thing I do not like is the way the previous Pakistani administartion stone walled (brick wall) and killed Mr. Bugti, thinking that it will solve the problems. That is the weakest and most unwise policy to follow and then cherish. I am sorry to say that similar policies in the past led to break-up of Bangla Desh from Pakistan

{"commentId":9123404,"threadId":"661241","contentId":"3196286","authorDomain":"moshawn"}
    Reply#4 - Fri Aug 28, 2009 6:42 PM EDT
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"661241","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"661241","contentId":"3196286"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking